The Puzzling Message of Figure in the Carpet :: Figure in the Carpet Essays

The Puzzling Message of Figure in the Carpet   At the beginning of The Figure in the Carpet, the principal(prenominal) character considers the criticism of literature to be a career, something he does for money. I had done a few things and earned a few pence (p. 357), declares the narrator in the opening line. He says later in the paragraph that having an advanced copy of a prominent novel to review was desirable because it would advance his career Öand whatsoever much or little it should do for his reputation I was clear on the spot as to what it should do for mine. (p. 357) The character sees Verekers work as a vehicle to advance his career. There seems to be little excitement as to the content of Verekers work, the reader is never given even so much as the subject matter of a Vereker novel. Instead, all of the focus of the opening scenes is directed towards the narrators struggle to become a renowned critic. Henry crowd together is contrasting the work of literar y criticism with the ideal of what literary criticism should be. Even the characters that seem to be in the purest pursuit of Verekers great secret, Corvick and Gwendolen, will not share it with their friends. When they regain it, they all want to publish it for themselves. Vereker himself seems to hold the literary critics in the book in contempt, citing their lack of vision. Vereker speaks to the narrator at several points in the novel, You miss it, my nigh(a) fellow, with inimitable assurance the fact that your being awfully clever and your articles being very awfully nice doesnt make a hairs breadth of difference. (p.365) The work of a literary critic in Verekers eyes is to find the figure in the carpet. Which is to say that what a literary critic and readers of literature should do is to look for a deeper meaning or context in works of literature. Vereker is debate because the critics fail to grasp the deeper meaning in his works. James himself must have been quite upset at the critics of his day. Influential critics can make or break a writer. More than anyone else, critics can sway how people perceive the work of an author. As James illustrates in the story, critics are not to be trusted as authority.